WELL KNOWN ILLINOIS ATTORNEY JONATHAN M. CYLUK CHARGED WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT

10/2/2009

Jonathan M. Cyrluk Esq

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SATURDAY OCTOBER 3, 2009-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics “watch dog” group, member has charged attorney Jonathan M. Cyrluk http://www.stetlerandduffy.com/jmc.htm with the law firm of Stetler & Duffy LTD with numerous counts of professional misconduct and violations of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. According to the complaint, Mr. Cyrluk an attorney who claims to defendant alleged “white” collar criminals before grand juries, Federal Prosecutors and before Appellate Courts fell pray to Attorney Michael T. Zeller's “scheme” to defraud Illinois Federal Court Judge Virginia Kendell by filing a “frivolous” Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment as to Defendants Central Mfg Inc and Stealth Industries, Inc. in the Northern Illinois District Court Case No. 07 CV 385 on September 30, 2009. According to the charge Mr. Cyrluk knew or should have known that the bankruptcy sale by assignment dated August 20, 2007 of Stoller's alleged trademark assets by Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel was a “naked” license and/or “license” in gross that did not transfer any valid trademark rights to attorney Lance G. Johnson's “sham” entity, “the Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse”. Michael T. Zeller, Lance G. Johnson and Jonathan M. Cyrluk to defraud the district court is meticulously documented in Stoller's 500 page “Position” Paper filed with the Illinois District Court on September 30, 2009.
Neither Michael T. Zeller, Lance G. Johnson or Jonathan M. Cyrluk could not be reached for this story.
Legal Disclaimer: Michael T. Zeller, Lance G. Johnson or Jonathan M. Cyrluk are considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

11 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Mary

10/2/2009 10:29:50 am

I hear about lawyers who violate the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct every day in Chicago Law Bulletin

Steve

10/2/2009 10:33:04 am

In my opinion Zeller set up Jonathan M Cyrluk to take a "fall".

Jake

10/2/2009 10:40:28 am

Jonathan Cyrluk why don't you ask Michael T. Zeller what a "naked" trademark license or a "license" in gross is? Then you would have seen that Fogel's August 20, 2007 Assignment of Stoller's assets isn't worth the paper that it is written, which is the foundation of your Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment...You continue to p aly "stupid" and you will lose your license and more....

Uncle Charlie

10/2/2009 03:30:51 pm

"THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE)" is a dog with no teeth at best.

leo

10/3/2009 03:46:42 pm

Porn star? That's nothing compared to what I did in the Cook County Jail this summer.

Leo The Lion

10/3/2009 04:26:38 pm

My name is "Leo." Not the Leo you're thinking off. But another Leo who uses random and deranged "quotes" with "little" sense of grammer, spellling or logic. Anyway, I found this "site" and decided to comment, as the "first amendment" "allows" "me" "to" "doo." In my "opinion," I predict that Leo will be spending more time in jail, maybe this time in the same jail with his brother.

Leo The Toadstool

10/3/2009 04:30:47 pm

Leo, in my opinion too, Leo Stoller is going to take yet another "fall." He will be be, in my opinion, adding to his long "list" of sanctions entered against him by courts for over a decade for gross misconduct.

Anon

10/3/2009 04:42:58 pm

Wow, I sure would hate being "charged" by Stoller's phony, fraudulent organization called the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics."

10/3/2009 04:43:29 pm

Leo, why don't you tell everyone the truth? The AEAE is a figment of your imagination that you trot out because you, personally, lack the slightest credibility.

Leo Stoller

10/3/2009 04:51:00 pm

And I went to the Illinois Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 in order to protect "our" first Amendment rights so that the people "above" could make the comments that they have on this Internet Site!

Ernest Banks

10/3/2009 07:41:21 pm

Uncle Charlie said: "THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE)" is a dog with no teeth at best.

Actually there's no dog either.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics