Well Known Long & Levit LLP Attorney Jessica MacGregor AEAE Rated 1/2 Star

12/26/2017

Chicago-(AEAE) THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS IN IT ANNUAL RATING OF LAWYERS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY RATES LONG & LEVIT LLP ATTORNEY JESSICA RUDIN MACGREGOR 1/2 STAR.
The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics has been rating attorneys since 1974. The ratings are based upon information gleaned from the public records, client complaints, client comments. AEAE top rating is 5 stars.
Jessica Rudin MacGregor was recently charged with being a back alley bully in writing a alleged threatened letter to a pro se party threatening sanctions unless the pro se party with draws his certificate of service in a Illinois DuPage County Law suit Case No. 2017 L 001177 in which Jessica Rudin MacGregor had previously agreed to accept service of all of the parties that she was now demanding that the pro se party withdraw his certificate of service.
When the pro se party called attention to the other Long & Levit LLP partners, of the alleged frivolous letter that Jessica Rudin MacGregor sent to the pro se party, they all scoffed, at the pro se's communication, requesting that they take the necessary remedial action to correct the alleged misconduct of their partner Jessica MacGregor, they did nothing, and the following other partners of Long & Levit LLP have also earned a 1/2 star rating:

None of the Long & Levit LLP attorneys could be reached for comment on this article. A spokes person for Long & Levit LLP claimed Jessica MacGregor is not a "back alley bully" that Jessica is a "supper Lawyer" that all attorneys, who work for the Long and Levit, with the exception of one or two, are "super" lawyers.
The long and Levit attorneys categorically reject any attorney rating association "ratings" that does not find their attorneys to be the best in America. In particular Jessica MacGregor, who is considered by her peers to be the third or fourth "toughest" lawyer on California Street in San Francisco. If she was a "man" she would be considered the "toughest" lawyer in San Francisco, but she is only a woman, and cannot ever get that accolade.

LEGAL DISCLOSURE: Jessica Rudin MacGregor and her partners are not charged with any professional misconduct, malfeasance, unlawful conduct here and are considered Innocent of any charges of professional misconduct until proven guilty by a court of law. Other peer rating associations rate Jessica and her partners as very highly qualified attorneys. AEAE has a slightly different opinion and bases its first amendment and constitutional right to express its opinion and to issue ratings to attorneys, in the same way that AVVO rates attorneys. SEE JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., v AVVO, INC., et al., Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

0 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics