WHO CARES ABOUT THE OSCARS? NO ONE!

3/9/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-EVERY SINCE BROKE BACK MOUNTIAN WAS NOMINATED FOR AN OSCAR in 2005, Americans have been loosing interest in the Oscars. Remember, Broke Back Mountain was a American gay-themed “sick”romantic-drama film that depicts the complex romantic and sexual relationship between two sodomites, “fag” cowboys. Since then, millions of people have turned off the Oscars. Broke Back Mountain represented the entire moral collapse of Hollywood.
That next year, 2006, the Oscars even featured, another homosexual theme, a lesbian, Allen Degenerate as the host. Since 2006 millions of Americans have turned off their TV's when the Oscars are presented. Today's La and Hollywood are yesterdays Sodom and Gomorrah. Who cares about tonights Oscars?

13 Comments

Stoller Loves Cock

3/7/2010 03:45:14 pm

Jesus, Stoller, could you be any more obvious, defensive or in denial? You've swallowed more semen than the entire Hollywood community combined.

Backfire

3/8/2010 12:24:02 am

Yuck! The First Amendment gives everyone the right to publish "speech" on the Internet? Even stupid people?

Leo the Cuck

3/8/2010 12:24:50 am

Quite a diatribe from a "man" whose former spouse tells everyone he wanted to help her have sex with real men and then clean everything up. Leo being a cuckold and part time switch hitter is pretty disgusting by itself, but wanting to slurp up the leftovers!!!!Jesus man, get some help!
By the way i asked my fav lawyer about your disiplinary complaints, she just laughed and laughed over the thought you have that anyone would bother notifying thier insurance comapny over a complaint you wrote, The disciplinary board doesn't even require responses on your trash anymore.

Go back to your glory hole in the nearest public mens room stall

Backfire

3/8/2010 12:29:52 am

Like You!

Russell

3/8/2010 02:13:48 am

I really am ashamed of you Leo, I know I spawned you and your worthless brother and I realize that I accomplished nothing while alive myself except teaching you how to cheat people but as I sit here roasting and look up at you I really wish I had used a rubber the night you were conceived

Stoller Family

3/8/2010 04:50:03 am

Leo, stop it. Just stop it. You are sick and need help. Stop embarrasing the family. Don't refer to Chris. He has done enough jail time because of you. Now it is your turn to do some jail time. And stop forging Christopher and Julie's signatures on things. Leave the family out of your sickness. JUST STOP IT!!! WE ARE SICK OF THE INTERVIEWS AND VISITS ABOUT YOU BEING A CRIMINAL!!!DO THE RIGHT THING ONCE IN YOUR LIFE AND THINK OF YOUR FAMILY!!!THEN MAYBE SOMEDAY WE WILL FORGIVE YOU!!!

Upfront

3/8/2010 08:32:57 am

Expect to spend the rest of your life defending yourself in court for malicious prosecution, fraud and RICO charges

Stupidity

3/8/2010 04:10:06 pm

For your information, 40% of the televisions in America watched the Oscars last Sunday. Mr. Stoller, if indeed it is you posting on this blog, you are nothing more than a homophobic imbecile.

3/8/2010 08:15:17 pm

A shout out to whoever posted about being friend of US attorney. Please repost. It seems you hit a nerve with Leo. He deleted your comment.

Leo the Imbecile

3/8/2010 11:37:49 pm

Leo isn't too bright, that's a given. As a matter of fact, he gives mental retardation a bad name-- there are plenty of mentally retarded people out there who wake up and try very hard to make an honest living and live a life of decency.

Leo, on the other hand, doesn't have two functioning brain cells in his abnormally bulbous head, and is the classic sociopath who has no conscience, no value system, and unfortunately for him, possesses no form of smarts whatsoever.

Leo's little rant about the Oscars is a classic example-- he says he won't turn on the television because of his distaste for the homosexual subject matter of a movie-- yet everything he does seems to be a concerted effort to get thrown in prison (where the homosexual lifestyle is part of the daily culture).

Leo, you truly are an idiot. You are going to wind up with some gangbanger reaching around and palming your pea-sized balls while he pumps you from behind like there is no tomorrow.

Leo, shut the hell up. Act like a man for once in your life and maybe, just maybe, you can avoid becoming a squealing little bitch being violated in a dank prison cell. Unless, of course, that's what you have always wanted.

RICO? Malicious prosecution? That's all you got? You are going to bet your freedom on your complete ineptitude regarding the law? Good luck with that, sport. Be sure to remember that while you are biting a pillow in half.

fed watcher

3/9/2010 01:24:16 am

It's about over for you leo. Your ex has been interviewed and testified and interviewed again, the law grabbed your brother long enough to squeeze him and burn you good. A chief judge of a Federal Circuit sent you tp the US Attorney.

The Grand Jury has been hearing testimony and you rant and rave about RICO suits and suing people forever.

Your ex has a dozen lawyers working for free and offering thier services for the future just to screw with you and you really think anyone is scared of you?

Don't you getr it you silly stupid little man: We screw with you on these posts out of humor and to pass the time during breaks from dealing with real matters all day long involving real people and we laugh and laugh at you.

Nobody really cares who you sue or file complaints against, none, not the public, not the courts, not other lawyers, not disciplinary authorities, not malpractice insurance carriers, no one. No one takes you serious, we goad you and will continue to untill they put you in prison.

By the way, I hear she is giving great head these days

stollerexposed.blog.com

3/9/2010 01:48:56 am

you guys crack me up. They r coming for you leo the lizard. Better douple ply that newspaper sport...

Zareo

3/9/2010 01:19:30 pm

Pendejo

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics