WOMEN THE PRIMARY CAUSE FOR THE HIGH DIVORCE RATE IN AMERICA

4/2/2012

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A NEW TEN YEAR STUDY CONDUCTED BY UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO NOBEL LAUREATE HAROLD GOLDENSHALF REVEALS WHY WOMEN DELIBERATELY PICK FIGHTS WITH THEIR MALE PARTNERS and are the primary cause for the high divorce rate in America. According to the study men fee better when their wives are happy, women on the other hand, are only more content whey their male partners are “upset or agitated.” Women believe that by making their male partner miserable, they are more invested in the relationship. Women want to engage around conflict, according to the lead author Psychologist Harold Goldenshalf, “because women feel more pleasure when their male partners are distressed. Men on the other hand find conflict threatening and feel the best about their relationships when their lives are in a good mood. Women need to be unhappy and are solely responsibility for the “high” divorce rate, especially among women ages 40 to 65. "Women are definitely from a different planet than man, there more vicious, able to get angry at the drop of a hat, hold grudges and less forgiving than their male counter parts. The most interesting thing about the study reveals that there is no guarantee how well a man treats his wife, how much money he gives his wife or how many offspring that the couple have in common there is absolutely no guarantee that a marriage will last forever. Everyday women leave the riches men in the world for no discernible reason other than their own emotional instability. Currently the divorce rate in American is 50% for first marriages, 67% for second marriages, 78% for third marriages and 91% for fourth marriages. Over 84% of these divorces are precipitated by women as the ultimate form of agitation to inflict on their husbands. Interestingly enough these female divorcee seldom are able to remarry because they have their biological clocks of desirability have expired (their over 40). " View the Author Leo Stoller's Spotlight

5 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Your Horoscope for April 2nd, 2012

4/1/2012 07:50:52 am

Sie haben sogar die Sonne in Ihrem Zeichen verbrannt. Jeder, der Sie kennt, wird erregt durch Ihre Anwesenheit von mehr als einer Minute. Sie haben jene, die einst geliebt, jetzt nicht mit der etwas zu tun mit dir gemacht entlastet. Sie erhalten zu Ihrer Stadt ein wenig besser in den nächsten paar Wochen wissen, wie Sie Ihren Job verlieren, bekommen abgeschottet auf und frage mich durch die Straßen auf der Suche nach Nahrung und Schutz. Leider Ihre biologische Uhr der Erwünschtheit ist ebenfalls abgelaufen, so dass die Menschen, die einmal mit Ihrem neurotische Persönlichkeit gesetzt haben würde, weil Ihr gutes Aussehen wird jetzt nicht einmal etwas mit dir zu tun. Konnte keine Verbindung zu einem schöneren Person passiert sein

child porno

4/1/2012 08:58:19 pm

nice touch Leo, A naked child made to look dead with an arrow in the back. I'll see if I can interest some agency in prosecuting you for this one.

Stan

4/2/2012 11:43:01 am

OK, your ex divorced you.. So what? A real man in your situation would join a gym, get in shape, get a younger hotter girlfriend and enjoy life. That's what a REAL MAN does. You on the other hand act like a miserable jackass unable to live up to the fact that you are to blame for your situation.

Bubba

4/3/2012 12:33:49 am

There is no such person or study you claim to quote. Once again you are exposed as the fraud you are.

Got it wrong

4/13/2012 12:23:08 pm

Sorry.............you got it wrong! Center for Health statistics reports that 72% of women file for divorce and if college educated 90 % of women file for divorce!! And the reason women file for divorce is their spouse committed ADULTERY. Women do not kill relationships, men do!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics