Blog Archives

HUSBAND HAS RIGHT TO GATHER EVIDENCE AGAINST HIS WIFE DISPITE ORDER OF PROTECTION

2/2/2010

NEW YORK-(AEAE)-A HUSBAND OR EX-HUSBAND HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO GATHER EVIDENCE against a former wife in a civil proceeding despite the fact that the woman has a order of protection against the husband. The man can have the wife followed and keep her home under surveillance 24/7 in order obtain evidence against her according to a New York Judge. According to the New York Law Journal a man who hired a detective to trail his wife to a motel where she was having an affair with a local priest was not stalking her, a New York judge has ruled. Forced to resign after her husband turned over a recording of her and the priest to the church where she worked, the wife accused her husband of violating an order of protection requiring him to stay away from her home and place of employment. But the judge held that the husband had the right to gather evidence to defend himself in a divorce proceeding. Click on the attached link to read the full story: Snooping by Detective 'Legitimate' Part of Divorce Process, Judge Finds

9 Comments

AEAE STUDY REVEALS THAT THE MAJORITY OF LAWYERS SUFFER FROM MANIC DEPRESSIVE ILLNESS

2/2/2010

12 Comments

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A 15 YEAR STUDY IN WHICH SEVERAL THOUSAND LAWYERS WERE STUDIED. AEAE FOUND A HIGH RATE OF MENTAL ILLNESS ALMOST THREE TIMES THAT OF A CONTROL SAMPLE. AEAE found that the attorney study group were not prone to schizophrenia, a disorder of thinking, but to manic-depression, a disorder of feeling. Manic depressives experience sharp mood swings from euphoric highs to despairing lows, which can lead to alcoholism or even suicide. A high percentage of the attorneys studied turned out to have manic depressive temperaments, a fact that may explain their attraction to the law in the first place. AEAE study reveals that mild manic highs if kept in check, can actually benefit the attorney. The study reveals that hundreds of the attorneys who fall into this category, are highly productive during their “up” phases” and able to ride through intermittent mild lows without any serious legal repercussions, sanctions, contempt and disbarment(s) . However a large number of attorneys who thrived on the creative rush of the early phase of the manic attack, soon they thrive no more; creativity turned into craziness, they can't write a brief if there life depended on it and they start shouting at the bailiffs and judges. Their engine(s) revves up too much, the practice of law becomes too intense and thoughts fly so fast that attorneys after several years in the profession no longer seem like they can connect to the law. That's why so many attorneys turn into alcoholics, end up facing the attorney registration and disciplinary commissions or face federal charges. Every once in a while you get a study that confirms people's worst fears and their intuitions.
SIDEBAR: The most interesting finding from this study is that the attorneys who can no longer practice law, have a tendency to become “judges” in order to be able to remain in the legal profession.

12 Comments

STOLLER CHARGES GORDON AND REES, ATTORNEY RYAN BROWN WITH DEFAMATION

2/1/2010

9 Comments

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS CHARGED GORDON AND REES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS HAYNES RYAN, CHANCE COOPER AND RYAN BROWN WITH INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT. Thursday Illinois Cook County Associate Judge granted Haynes Ryan motion to strike Stoller's citations against Attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman and Chance Cooper. Stoller appealed Judge Gillespie's decision on Friday. The case still remains against Gordon and Rees attorney Ryan Brown. Mr. Brown sent to Stoller a letter that is in his opinion per se defamatory claiming that Stoller is guilty of “Contempt” and a class four felony. See attached defamatory letter(s) by clicking on these link(s): http://www.filefront.com/15466513/Jan%2029%202010%20ryan%20Letter.pdf
http://www.filefront.com/15473861/letter%201-31-10%20Brown.pdf

9 Comments

Forward>>

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

HUSBAND HAS RIGHT TO GATHER EVIDENCE AGAINST HIS WIFE DISPITE ORDER OF PROTECTION

AEAE STUDY REVEALS THAT THE MAJORITY OF LAWYERS SUFFER FROM MANIC DEPRESSIVE ILLNESS

STOLLER CHARGES GORDON AND REES, ATTORNEY RYAN BROWN WITH DEFAMATION

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTYInternships not available now​

Archives

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now