Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

WHO CARES ABOUT THE WORLD CUP?

6/13/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
2 Comments

2 MILLION CELEBRATE THE CHICAGO BLACK HAWKS STANLEY CUP VICTORY FRIDAY

6/12/2010

7 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE) The  Chicago Black Hawks carried the Stanley Cup along the streets of Chicago in front of an adoring crowd the mayor's office estimated at 2 million Friday. Move people  attended the event  than live in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. Last time the Hawks won was in 1961. Chicago needed a winner tp://www.chicagotribune.com/videobeta/dfcc29cf-83f5-465f-ab23-a7101bdc773a/News/Sights-and-sounds-of-Blackhawks-victory-parade
 
7 Comments

MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY PROBATE JUDGE DIANE E. WINTER LODGED TODAY

6/11/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
WAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS-(AEAE)-TODAY A MOTION WAS FILED FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PROBATE JUDGE DIANE E. WINTER ON THE GROUNDS THAT SHE IS BIAS AND PREJUDICE AND THAT THE PETITION COULD NOT RECEIVE A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL HEARING BEFORE HER. An emergency motion was filed before Judge Winter for hearing on June 8, 2010. Judge Winter refused to hear the emergency motion on June 8, 2010. Judge Winter entered and continued it for hearing on June 10, 2010. When all of the parties were present, Judge Winter instead of allowing the petitioner to present its case, demanded to make the determination if there was a emergency prior to allowing the petitioner to argue his case. It was obvious that Judge Winter was in the process of dismissing the petitioner's emergency without giving the petitioner his “day” in court. The Petitioner said to the judge,”Why don't you just dismiss the case without allowing me the opportunity to make any argument and I will take an immediate appeal!”

Judge Winter said,”Let the record show that the petitioner is pointing a finger at me and leaning toward me!”. At that point the petitioner made an oral motion for “substitution of judge for cause.” Judge Diane E. Winter then transferred to case to Judge Margaret J. Mullen for hearing on the substitution of judge for cause oral motion. Judge Mullen set a briefing schedule and July hearing date.
SIDEBAR: The Petitioner served opposing counsel, who had been dodging service of an amended complaint name him as a necessary party in a 100 million dollar Malicious Prosecution Lawsuit, in open court and on the record. The Wauconda, Illinois Lawyer attempted to walk away from the papers, but the sheriff said, "I think that these papers belong to you!"

5 Comments

CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS WIN STANLEY CUP AFTER 48 YEARS!

6/10/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-  Blackhawks win Stanley Cup    Chicago ends its 48-year Stanley Cup drought by beating Philadelphia in OT.
It proves beyond any doubt that if you hang in there long enough, you'll win the game, wheither it is a sporting event or litigation. Go Blackhawks!

5 Comments

BRYAN CAVE LLC ASSOCIATE COUNSEL “BAG MAN” MICHAEL WERICH REFUSES TO COOPERATE WITH SUPPLEMENTING THE RECORD ON APPEAL

6/9/2010

11 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY IN COURT BRYAN CAVE LLC, SENIOR PARTNER STEVEN R. SMITH SENT HIS “BAG MAN” MICHAEL WERICH and RODNEY PERRY to a court hearing before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Charles Wrinkler. Judge Wrinkler sent the request to substitute him as judge to Judge Maddox the Chief Law Division Judge. Judge Maddox assigned the case to Judge Susan Zwick. Judge Zwick set the hearing for next week. Mr. Werich refused to cooperate and agree to the filing of a supplement to an appeal record, insisting that a motion be filed before Judge Mary Ann Mason in order to get her permission. Michael Werich and Steven R. Smith have been charged with a petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt for false swearing perjury and subornation of perjury. Brayan and Cave LLC would not return any phone calls regarding this story.

Picture
11 Comments

BRYAN CAVE LLP CHARGED WITH AIDING AND ABETTING THEIR CLIENT BANK OF AMERICA IN THE COMMISSION OF A TORT

6/8/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE WELL KNOWN NATIONAL LAW FIRM OF BRYAN AND CAVE, ATTORNEYS STEVEN R. SMITH AND HIS BAG MAN MICHAEL WERICH HAVE BEEN CHARGED IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS WITH THE COMMISSION OF TORT IN REPRESENTING THEIR CLIENT BANK OF AMERICA.
In a related story Bank of America will pay $108 million to settle federal charges that Countrywide Financial Corp., which it acquired nearly two years ago, collected outsized fees from borrowers facing foreclosure. The settlement, which seeks to refund money to about 200,000 borrowers, was announced today by the Federal Trade Commission. It is the largest mortgage industry settlement for the agency, which has been criticized for failing to protect consumers from abuse by financial companies. Bank of America to Pay Borrowers $108 Million in Countrywide Case

6 Comments

STOLLER MOVES TO CONSOLIDATE LANCE G. JOHNSON INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT APPEALS

6/7/2010

11 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- STOLLER FILED SEVEN APPEALS OF THE LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ. INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT APPEALS.  Illinois Judge Gellespie dismissed Stoller Indirect Criminal contempt petitions against attorneys  Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, Hayes Ryan, Chance Cooper and Ryan Brown. Stoller has now moved to consolidate all of the appeals in one so that the brief schedule can now proceed. The underlying  100 million dollar defamation case has been stayed by the Illinois Cook County Chief Judge Madoxx, who placed the case on the "Appellate Stay" Calender. 

Picture
11 Comments

BAR ASSOCIATION DISBARS A LAWYER FOR “ONE” HOUR

6/6/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AN ATTORNEY WAS DISBARRED BY THE BAR ASSOCIATION FOR “ONE” HOUR FOR SHOWING A FEMALE CLIENT A CELL PHONE PICTURE OF HIS GENITALS DURING A COURT HEARING. A mitigating circumstance was the admission by the attractive blond, female client, who was shown the genitals during the court hearing  that she was not offended, having been a prostitute for ten years. The female client, admitted to the Bar Association Prosecutor that she was not quite sure what she was in fact seeing when the attorney handed her his cell phone showing her a photo of his genitals.
A female court room bailiff who reported the incident, claimed she was having an affair with the attorney and took the photo of his genitals. For her part, the bailiff was suspended from work for a month without pay.
A spokesman for the Bar Association said that they are being swamped with attorney disciplinary complaints and that the Bar Association felt the one hour agreed disbarment was a sufficient penalty under the circumstances to resolve the incident, which sends a strong message to other attorneys not to show clients pictures of their genitals during court appearances.
The offending attorney was also ordered to perform 100 hours of pro bono work representing prostitutes who are unable to afford a lawyer. The attorney was permitted to have his law license reinstated after the hour disbarment had expired.

Picture
2 Comments

STOLLER APPEALS ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES GEROLD BENDER, NAOMI H. SCHUSTER AND JEANNIE CLEVELAND BERSTEIN

6/5/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-APPEALS HAVE JUST BEEN FILED INVOLVING ERRONEOUS DECISIONS MADE BY ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES GEROLD BENDER, NAOMI H. SCHUSTER AND JEANNIE CLEVELAND BERSTEIN WITH THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT FIRST DIVISION. The Illinois Constitution Article VI Section 6 provides that any Illinois citizen has an “automatic right to appeal a final decision by a Illinois Circuit Court Judge to the Appellate Court. Stoller requested leave from Judge Bender to file such an appeal. Judge Bender ignored the Illinois Constitution and the U.S. Constitution, which provides a party with the right to appeal and denied the request to file an appeal. Stoller asked Judge Bender to give him leave to appeal the denial decision, Judge Bender denied that request too. Stoller appealed that decision and moved for substitution of judge (SOJ) Bender on the grounds that he is bias and prejudice and that he cannot get a fair and impartial hearing before him. The SOJ was transferred to Judge Naomi H. Schuster who set the hearing on the SOJ on the same date and time that Stoller was appearing before Judge Lee Preston. Judge Schuster refused to move the SOJ hearing on Bender to another date, Stoller moved for SOJ of judge Schuster. The Schuster SOJ was assigned to Judge Jeannie Cleveland Bernstein. Judge Bernstein without even reading Stoller complete Motion for SOJ and Memorandum which had the support of a recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision, said, “In you divorce proceeding were you granted an SOJ?” Opposing counsel replied, “Stoller had one SOJ, he is not entitled to another automatic change of judge.” Judge Bernstein said, “You SOJ of Judge Schuster is denied.” Stoller asked her for leave to appeal Judge Bernstein said, “I don't care what you do!” In the following case a pro se party was also asking Judge Bernstein for an SOJ. Judge Bernstein granted it saying this is a “post decree” request for SOJ and you are entitled to receive one automatic change of Judge.” Stoller re-approached the bench and informed Judge Bernstein that he also was involved in a post decree proceeding and like wise was entitled as a matter of law to a substitution of Judge Schuster.” Judge Bernstein said, “Stoller you're appealing my decision.” “Stoller replied, “Why should we waist the the time of the Appellate Court with a appeal of a decision which is reversible?” Judge Bernstein said, “Appeal it”!

8 Comments

ANOTHER LAWYER SUSPENDED FOR MAKING SEXUAL ADVANCES WITH A CLIENT

6/5/2010

16 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A personal injury lawyer who was caught on tape making unwelcome sexual advances to a client has been suspended from practicing law for six months. Allen H. Isaac avoided the harsher five-year suspension sought by a hearing panel and total disbarment sought by a disciplinary committee. The committee had charged Isaac with professional misconduct after he allegedly asked a client for oral sex and made inappropriate comments about the judiciary, much of which the client secretly caught on tape.
76-Year-Old Lawyer Suspended for 6 Months for Sexual Misconduct
New York Law Journal

16 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.